Court of Appeal dismisses appeal of High refusal to restrain a Garda disciplinary investigation into allegations that a Garda assaulted a prisoner in custody after he was convicted in the District Court but was successful in his Circuit Court appeal when the complainant failed to attend Court, on the grounds that: a) there is nothing in the relevant legislation which expressly precludes the commencement of disciplinary proceedings following the acquittal of the member in the wake of a criminal prosecution which GSOC itself had recommended; b) the acquittal must be regarded as an acquittal on the merits; c) the applicant can demonstrate that some of the disciplinary charges involve an investigation into the same facts as the criminal prosecution; and d) the continuation of the disciplinary charges would not be unfair and oppressive and the applicant has not acquired any legitimate expectation which bound the Commissioner and precluded the commencement of the disciplinary proceedings.
Judicial review – garda disciplinary proceedings – appeal of High refusal to restrain Garda disciplinary investigation – appellant is a member of An Garda Síochána who has been suspended from operational duties – appellant is alleged to have used unprofessional and discriminatory language towards a person in custody and also to have used excessive force – s. 102 of the Garda Síochána Act 2005 – Garda Síochána (Discipline) Regulations 2007 (S.I. No. 214 of 2007) – involvement of GSOC in the disciplinary process – relevant provisions of the 2005 Act – applicant’s case regarding the 2005 Act – there is nothing in the 2005 Act which expressly precludes the commencement of disciplinary proceedings following the acquittal of the member in the wake of a criminal prosecution which GSOC itself had recommended – Article 8 of the 2007 Regulations – when disciplinary proceedings may be continued against a member of the force even though that Garda may have been acquitted of any criminal charge – whether the disciplinary proceedings would involve an inquiry into the same issues in respect of which the applicant was so acquitted – would the continuation of the disciplinary charges be unfair and oppressive – legitimate expectations – applicant had not acquired any legitimate expectation which bound the Commissioner and precluded the commencement of the disciplinary proceedings – appeal dismissed.