Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal allows appeal from High Court, and sets aside order dismissing as statute-barred a claim for injuries allegedly sustained in the workplace between 1994 and 2004 by reason of exposure to chemicals, on the grounds that: (a) the court's decision had relied on a 2008 report received by the defendants in discovery, which suggested that the plaintiff had the necessary knowledge by that date; (b) the report was not necessarily admissible simply because it had been ordered in discovery; (c) an order to dismiss an action should not normally be granted based on documents alone; and (d) in the instant case, fair procedures required that the contents of the report be put to the plaintiff in cross-examination.
Noonan J (nem diss): Personal injuries - dismissal of action - time limit - motion to dismiss heard on affidavit - alleged exposure to toxic chemicals while employed as aircraft mechanic with Defence Forces between 1994 and 2004 - no diagnosis of causation until 2011 - date of knowledge - Statute of Limitations (Amendment) Act, 1991 - earlier medical records - whether plaintiff had knowledge at an earlier date - whether documents exhibited by defendant were inadmissible hearsay - whether an application to dismiss was an 'interlocutory order' - interpretation of expert report - report obtained by plaintiff in 2008 - status of discovered documents - distinction between documents that were receivable and documents that were admissible - whether plaintiff should have been cross-examined on the documents.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.