Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal dismisses appeal from High Court, and affirms order made on consent striking out an application for an order to dismiss a claim for trespass on hotel property by a neighbour, where the neighbour had given an open-ended undertaking not to trespass, on the grounds that the hotel owners were entitled to rely on the open-ended undertaking, and there were no grounds to strike out proceedings as vexatious.
Whelan J (judgment of the court): Litigation concerning hotels - alleged trespass on part of neighbour - undertaking offered by neighbour - undertakings accepted by court - open-ended undertakings - application by neighbour for order striking out proceedings - indication by neighbour that he was agreeable for application to be struck out - permanent undertakings.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.