Supreme Court dismisses appeal from Court of Appeal, and affirms determination (by way of case stated from the High Court) that the provision of legal aid in challenges to a European arrest warrant by way of an administrative "Legal Aid Custody Issues Scheme", as opposed to a statutory entitlement to legal aid, did not: (a) render any potential surrender unconstitutional; nor (b) give rise to an issue of law that should be referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union.
European arrest warrant - application of "Legal Aid Custody Issues Scheme" - conviction in UK of tax fraud - surrender sought to serve sentence - charge of absconding - equality before the law - Article 40.1, constitution - no requirement of legal aid in framework decision - non-statutory provision of legal aid in EAW case - administrative scheme rather than statutory - certification only available at close of proceedings - recommendation of legal aid at commencement of proceedings - scheme not binding on Attorney General - AG could refuse to honour any recommendation - question posed: “Is it correct that Article 11.2 of the Framework Decision (on the European Arrest Warrant) in conjunction with Article 47 of the EU Charter and the general principles of EU law imposes no obligation to provide legal aid, whether as of right or otherwise for indigent respondents in EAW cases that do not have the skill to represent themselves?” - appeal on two issues: i. whether inequality under constitution arising from discretionary scheme, giving rise to potential order of surrender inconsistent with the constitution; ii. whether necessary to refer issue to CJEU - preliminary objection only - consequences of finding of unconstitutionality of legal aid provisions - differences between Legal Aid (Custody) Scheme of 2003 and the Criminal Justice (Legal Aid) Act 1962.