Adverse credibility findings against Pakistani asylum applicants were coherent, sound and not vitiated by any material error

Judicial review – telescoped hearing – Pakistani national challenging the decision of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal to refuse him and his family refugee status – claims that he and his wife converted to the Ahmadi faith – that his family threatened him, his wife and children – that he was beaten – his children were kidnapped – family moved to his wife’s uncle’s house – father attempted to negotiate with his family but he was again threatened – fled to Ireland – lacked knowledge of the Ahmadi religion – Tribunal found that the family lacked credibility and made a number of adverse credibility findings – Pakistani family argued that no reason was given as to why two medical reports affect the credibility of the Pakistani father – argued that they were not afforded an opportunity to clarify the contradiction in the testimony, in breach of fair procedures - findings based on demeanour require special care and attention – Tribunal absolutely rejected their credibility.