Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal from the High Court, and affirmed the refusal to hear the trial of a preliminary issue regarding an alleged agreement between Ireland and the UK, which purportedly allows UK military aircraft to enter Irish airspace for interception purposes - despite the fact that the preliminary issue had been ordered by another High Court judge. The High Court had previously directed the trial of a preliminary issue to determine if the government's executive power in relation to external security and external relations was justiciable based on the facts as pleaded. However, the High Court ultimately refused to consider the preliminary issue due to the absence of agreed facts and the State's refusal to confirm or deny the existence of such an agreement. The Court of Appeal dismissed the State's appeal, concluding that the State's application was effectively seeking to strike out the proceedings without the necessary agreement on material facts for a preliminary issue trial.
Court of Appeal, High Court, judicial review, justiciability, external security, external relations, international agreement, Constitution of Ireland, Article 29.5.1, executive power, RAF (Royal Air Force), airspace, separation of powers, public interest privilege, discovery, preliminary issue, O. 25, r. 1 RSC (Rules of the Superior Courts), O. 19, r. 28 RSC, material facts, national security.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.