Court of Appeal allows appeal against a finding of liability in personal injuries proceedings, on the grounds that the management company of the plaintiff's apartment complex were not liable for injuries suffered when he slipped and fell on ice outside, and it would be unreasonably burdensome to impose a duty to grit pedestrian common areas in anticipation of bad weather.
Court of Appeal – appeal of judgement finding the defendant liable for injuries suffered by plaintiff when he slipped and fell on ice outside his apartment – defendants management company of apartment complex – owners and occupiers of the common areas – plaintiff apartment owner – all apartment owners were members of the management company and plaintiff was a member of the residents committee – particulars of negligence – engineer report – no updated particulars of negligence – trial judge held that the defendants had a duty to grit the landing where he fell – section 13 of the Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004 – expert reports not a substitute for pleadings – reasonable care informed by expert evidence – fact that a particular precaution might have prevented an injury provides no basis for finding that it ought to have been taken – no evidence that management companies regularly carry out gritting of pedestrian areas if bad weather is anticipated – no code of practice or relevant standard – unreasonably burdensome to impose a duty to grit pedestrian common areas in anticipation of bad weather – duty on plaintiff to take care for his own safety – ought to have anticipated potential for presence of ice – knew it was cold and knew it was wet – could be regarded as guilty of a high degree of contributory negligence – allow appeal – order dismissing the plaintiff’s claim.