Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal dismisses appeal from High Court, and affirms refusal to strike out a claim by way of summary summons in the sum of €250,000, where the summons was issued in 2012, service was not effected until 2015 (following an order of substituted service), and a notice of intention to proceed was issued in 2017, on the grounds that, even if the delay was inordinate and inexcusable: (a) the case was a 'pure documents' case, based on a signed contract that had not been contested by the defendant on affidavit; (b) the debtor had contributed towards the delay, in that service required a court order and he did not enter an appearance for two years after service on him; (c) the claim that the debtor that he was impecunious did not affect the validity of the debt; and (d) accordingly, the debtor was unable to establish sufficient prejudice as to sway the balance of justice in favour of dismissing the action.
Whelan J (nem diss): Application to dismiss action - delay or want of prosecution - renewal of summary summons - claim for €250K - summons issued in 2012 - renewal of summons in 2015 - attempts to serve - substituted service - 2017 notice of intention to proceed - appearance entered - application to strike out - whether delay inordinate or inexcusable - balance of justice - factors affecting discretion of court in considering balance of justice - a 'pure documents' case - whether debtor prejudiced by the delay - whether debtor contributed to the delay - need to demonstrate prejudice - debtor's experience of litigation.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.