Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Master of the High Court sends debt collection case forward for plenary hearing.
Summary summons - "leave to defend" - order 2, Rules of Superior Courts - O 37, r 10, RSC - avenue available to any defendant refused leave to defend - position of lay litigants - patience of court - crowded Monday morning lists - whether hearings fair - Article 6, European Convention on Human Rights - hearsay evidence on affidavit - O 40, r 4, RSC - notices to cross-examine - abuses of process - opinion of solicitor - whether opinion safe basis for court's determination - confusion for lay litigant arriving in court to answer claim - arguable defence - entitlement to plenary hearing - UK summary judgment procedure - admissibility of unsworn statement - status of oath - hearsay evidence - barristers' code of conduct - whether any genuine issue as to any material fact - whether anything for the jury to decide - inefficient use of court time - what constituted a fair hearing - position of different defendants - European Convention of Human Rights - whether bank had duty of care not to lend to borrower who could not repay.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.