Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Amount of time given to local authority to remediate an illegal dump was appropriate
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal dismisses appeal and upholds decision of the High Court in relation to the amount of time allowed to a local authority to comply with an order to remediate a site that was used for illegal dumping, on the grounds that: (a) all the steps set out in the judgment of the High Court were either necessary or appropriate in the circumstances of the huge illegal dump which required remediation; (b) the times suggested for each step are indicative, not binding, and were reasonably tight for a public authority to comply with; and (c) the trial judge's assessment is within the margin of appreciation to be afforded to a High Court judge in the exercise of his discretion as to the order to be made under the legislation; and the Court allows appeal and makes an order for the appellant's costs in relation to certain matters, on the ground that the trial judge erred in principle in relation to some of the orders as to costs.
Costello J (nem diss): Appeal of a decision of the High Court in relation to the amount of time allowed to the Council to comply with the order that it is to remediate a site that was used for illegal dumping - proceedings related to two related actions concerning the remediation of an illegal dump in Wicklow - s. 58 of the Waste Management Act 1996 - long and complex proceedings - the Council itself had dumped vast amounts of waste at the illegal landfill - High Court directed the Council to remediate the site in full - whether timeframe set out by the Court for remediation was appropriate - ground of appeal dismissed - whether High Court was correct in not awarding all the costs of the proceedings - appeal allowed in relation to certain aspects of the costs order - Court orders the council to pay to the appellant the costs of the agreement of the issue paper, the costs of the application for a modular trial, the costs of the application to re-enter the proceedings against another party and the costs of Modules III and IV of the modular trial.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
