Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court determines that defendants were guilty of contempt of court, after they sought to put assets beyond reach of plaintiff in defiance of court orders.
Attachment and committal - alleged breaches of order of court - order of High Court (Clarke J), 27 June 2011 - alleged conspiracy to alter way in which property portfolio held - security held by plaintiff over companies - attempts to remove value of company away from companies to separate structure - orders restraining defendants from breaching share pledges, transferring assets to third parties, or exercising rights over shares inconsistent with interests of plaintiff - alleged breaches of orders - alleged assignment of $163 million worth of loans to entity in Belize - backdating of assignments of loans - assignment of debt of $45.2 million to company controlled by another defendant with aim of taking control of Ukranian asset worth $78 million - transfer of $500K to personal bank account - pattern of wresting control of assets - use of offshore companies - series of unlawful acts to breach security arrangements with plaintiff - corporate structure of defendant companies - asset stripping - requirement that contempt be proven beyond reasonable doubt - advice taken from leading international law firms in respect of transactions - obstacles and obstruction faced by plaintiff in making its case - evasiveness of defendants in witness box - irrelevant criticisms of plaintiff given by defendant - untruthful evidence - dispute by defendants as to their liability to the plaintiff - debt of €455 million undisputed.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.