The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal by the appellant challenging his conviction on various counts of sexual assault, false imprisonment, and assault causing harm. The appellant's appeal was based on four grounds: the joint trial of three incidents, the failure to discharge the jury, a delay in detaining the appellant under statute, and an error in extending his detention under statute. The Court found no error in the trial judge's refusal to sever the indictment or to discharge the jury. The Court also ruled that there was no unreasonable delay in detaining the appellant, and the detention was lawful under the applicable statute, which allows for detention for the proper investigation of the offences for which a judge had authorised arrest. Consequently, the appellant's detention and the procedures followed during the trial were deemed lawful, affirming the original conviction.
sexual assault, false imprisonment, assault causing harm, Court of Appeal, joint trial, jury discharge, Criminal Justice Act 1984, Criminal Justice Act 1999, detention, arrest, indictment, appeal dismissed, lawful procedures, investigation, conviction affirmed.