Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from the High Court, upholding its decision to refuse relief sought by a taxpayer and his company who sought to set aside historic settlement agreements with the Revenue Commissioners regarding a 1994 tax audit. The appellants argued that they were coerced into settlement under duress and only discovered years later that key bank accounts used in the audit were fraudulently opened in their name, seeking restitution of substantial sums paid. The Court found that the claims were statute-barred as the relevant facts were or could have been discovered with reasonable diligence many years prior to the commencement of proceedings. The Court rejected arguments that the limitation period should be extended on grounds of fraudulent concealment or 'equitable fraud', finding no credible evidence that Revenue concealed any right of action. Additionally, the Court held that due to the passage of time—including the death and unavailability of key witnesses—a fair trial was no longer possible. The appeal was dismissed and the order for costs in favour of Revenue was affirmed.
settlement agreement – tax audit – duress – fraudulent concealment – statute of limitations – statute-barred claims – Court of Appeal – High Court – Revenue Commissioners – restitution of sums paid – Rules of the Superior Courts (RSC) – s.71(1)(b) Statute of Limitations 1957 – unfair trial – delay and fair procedures – judgment upholding dismissal – costs order
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.