The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from the High Court, upholding the decision that a defendant’s counterclaim to a possession action regarding agricultural lands was time-barred. The defendant argued entitlement to the lands based on promises and alleged a remedial constructive or resulting trust, but had failed to initiate proceedings within two years of the death of the deceased landowner, as required. The Court held that all such claims—regardless of whether framed as estoppel, trust, or unjust enrichment—arose from acts or omissions of the deceased during his lifetime and thus were subject to a strict two-year limitation period. The defendant’s additional arguments for extension based on mental health, disability, or deceit were rejected, with the Court emphasising the need for certainty in the administration of estates and affirming the statutory policy underpinning the limitation period. As a result, the decision of the High Court was affirmed, barring the counterclaim, and costs were provisionally awarded to the plaintiff/respondent.
appeal dismissed – limitation period – time-barred claim – counterclaim to possession – promissory estoppel – proprietary estoppel – remedial constructive trust – resulting trust – unjust enrichment – High Court – Court of Appeal – Civil Liability Act 1961 – Statute of Limitations 1957 – Order 34 RSC – mental health disability – deceit and fraud arguments – certainty in administration of estates – costs order