Identification from CCTV and ear defect is deemed fair in firearms possession case

Court of Appeal dismisses an appeal against a conviction for possession of firearms and ammunition, affirming the original decision of the trial court. The appellant challenged the fairness of using a custody photograph and a garda's commentary on CCTV footage to identify a distinctive ear defect. The court found that the evidence was admissible and the trial process fair, with the jury entitled to assess the circumstantial evidence, including the CCTV footage and the appellant's DNA on items found at the crime scene. The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the identification process and the garda's commentary did not prejudice the jury to an extent requiring a discharge.