Court of Appeal dismisses an appeal by a litigant who was subject to an Isaac Wunder order, which restrained him from instituting proceedings related to certain properties and borrowings without prior leave of the High Court. The litigant's attempt to challenge the actions of a receiver was deemed an abuse of process by the High Court, and the Court of Appeal concurred, emphasising that permission to appeal was also required under the restraining order. The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's decision, confirming that the proposed proceedings were frivolous and vexatious with no prospect of success.
Court of Appeal, Isaac Wunder order, litigation restraint order, abuse of process, receivership, High Court, permission to appeal, frivolous and vexatious litigation, appeal dismissed, Rules of the Superior Courts (RSC), litigation filter, unmeritorious claims, leave of the court.