Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Appeal dismissed as litigant’s attempt to challenge receivership deemed frivolous and vexatious
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal dismisses an appeal by a litigant, subject to an Isaac Wunder order, against the High Court's refusal to grant leave to institute proceedings challenging the actions of a receiver. The litigant contended that the remaining receiver could not act alone following the retirement of the co-receiver, thus invalidating subsequent actions. The High Court had previously determined the proposed proceedings to be an abuse of process, frivolous, vexatious, and lacking prospects of success. The Court of Appeal concurred, emphasising that the appeal itself was not maintainable without High Court leave, as required by the restraining order, and upheld the High Court's judgment.
Isaac Wunder order, litigation restraint order, receivership, abuse of process, frivolous and vexatious litigation, High Court, Court of Appeal, appeal dismissal, permission to appeal, litigation history, receiver's authority, RSC (Rules of the Superior Courts).
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
