High Court grants leave to appeal its own decision regarding the refusal of certain grounds for judicial review in an international protection case, which had partially denied leave to seek judicial review against the International Protection Appeals Tribunal's (IPAT) decision, which had refused the applicants international or subsidiary protection, on the grounds that issues arise as to: whether the trial judge correctly applied the substantial grounds threshold in the case, particularly in relation to fair procedures and the right to an effective appeal when IPAT made a determination on nexus without a finding from the International Protection Office; and whether the judge was correct in determining that the material provided by the applicants was insufficient to establish substantial grounds regarding nexus established by membership of a family group.
International Protection Appeals Tribunal (IPAT) - International Protection Office (IPO) - judicial review - substantial grounds - nexus - refugee Convention ground - family group - fair procedures - effective appeal - Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000 - Employment Permits (Amendment) Act 2014 - Court of Appeal Act 2014 - leave to appeal - public interest - International Protection Act 2015 - asylum - immigration - citizenship (AIC) - McNamara test - Article 26.