Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Supreme Court determines that an appellant was entitled to raise issues of European law in relation to an appeal concerning whether an objector to a development was entitled to be heard by An Bord Pleanala as to whether a development consistent of strategic infrastructure, on the grounds that the scope of appeals to the Supreme Court should not be confined in a technical manner to the leave granted.
Clarke J (nem diss): Planning and development - scope of appeal - boundaries of issues - Planning and Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act, 2006 - person who wishes to oppose a development - whether the development came within the scope of the 2006 Act - strategic infrastructural development - whether entitled to be heard by An Bord Pleanala - formation of opinion as to whether development was strategic infrastructure - whether 2006 Act properly transposed directive 2011/92 - whether objector had a right to be heard at the stage of the decision as to whether the development came within the scope of the Act.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only fast reporting service for all Irish judgments over the past ten years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now