Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal allows appeal against severity of sentence for sexual offences and varies the sentence from 20 years in aggregate with no part suspended to 20 years with the final two and a half years suspended unconditionally, on the grounds that the appellant was 68 at the time of sentencing and, as the nature of the offending was such that a very lengthy sentence had to be considered, the age of the appellant ought to have been afforded specific weight where the sentence was likely to see the appellant serving all or the greater part of whatever life he has remaining in custody.
Offences: range of sexual offences committed between 1981 and 2015
Original sentence: aggregate sentence of 20 years, structured as one sentence of eight years imprisonment and three sentences of four years imprisonment, to be served consecutively
Appeal by: defence
Outcome: sentence varied
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.