Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court refuses judicial review of a decision of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to grant an Industrial Emissions license to a rendering plant for “the disposal or recycling of animal carcasses and animal waste” The applicant, who did not participate in the licensing process and lived a significant distance from the plant, claimed the State failed to properly transpose EU directives regarding environmental impact assessments (EIA) for projects requiring industrial emissions licenses. The Court ruled that the activist lacked standing, as he did not demonstrate a "sufficient interest" in the matter, nor was he directly affected by the plant's operations. The Court emphasized that EU law does not mandate standing for individuals to prosecute an actio popularis, and the Irish rules ensure the "wide access to justice" required by the Aarhus Convention and EU law.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Industrial Emissions license, rendering plant, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), EU Directive 2014/52/EU, standing, actio popularis, Aarhus Convention, sufficient interest, public participation, judicial review, environmental activism, EU law, Irish law, High Court decision.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.