Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses the defendants' application to submit fresh evidence in an appeal concerning a mortgage possession order, on the grounds that the evidence did not meet the criteria for new evidence as it was not in existence at the time of the trial and could have been obtained with reasonable diligence.
Mortgage possession - fresh evidence - appeal - High Court - Order 61 RSC 1986 - Circuit Court - GDPR - beneficial ownership - legal title - securitisation - Murphy v Minister for Defence - evidence criteria - de novo hearing - Courts of Justice Act 1936 - Start Mortgages DAC - European Residential Loan Securitisation 2019-NPL1 DAC - Hudson Advisors - data controller - data processor - personal data - assignment, transfer of loan - Certificate of Compliance - Practice Direction CC17.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.