Application to review court decision is refused where no flaws in the proceedings are identified

Application asking the court to review its decision dismissing appeals - court has a limited and exceptional jurisdiction to review its decisions – matters not before the Court on appeal raised – matters that did not fall for adjudication on appeal - a matter that was not before the High Court, and formed no part of its decision, cannot form any part of an appeal to this Court, and this cannot be rectified merely by including the issue concerned in submissions to this Court - fails to identify the denial of fair procedures to which he alludes, or any denial of constitutional justice such as to engage the jurisdiction of the court to review its judgment - fact that the court was critical of the appellant for such conduct does not give rise, and could not give rise, to the exercise by the court of its exceptional jurisdiction to review its own judgment and order - not identified any flaw in the proceedings before this Court, let alone any that could be considered to constitute a denial of constitutional justice - not open to the Court to receive new evidence of this kind in an application such as this – application dismissed –