Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court has affirmed the legality of orders for the continued detention and treatment of a vulnerable individual at a specialized mental health facility, utilizing the court's inherent jurisdiction. The individual, who suffers from a severe mental illness and lacks the capacity to make decisions regarding his treatment, was unable to be treated as a voluntary patient due to the complexity of his needs and the absence of a statutory mechanism for direct admission to the facility. The court's decision ensures the individual's constitutional rights are vindicated, filling a statutory gap that left no alternative lawful mechanism to secure his treatment.
- Inherent jurisdiction of the High Court - Vulnerable individual - Mental health
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.