Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Arbitrator’s award for costs enforced after respondent fails to challenge or request adjudication
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court grants enforcement of an arbitrator's award against a respondent who failed to challenge the award or request adjudication of the arbitrator's costs, where the arbitrator's decision, which directed the respondent to pay €40,224.10 in costs, was deemed valid and enforceable as no set-aside application was made under Article 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law, and no valid request for adjudication was made under the relevant statute.
Arbitration Act 2010 - UNCITRAL Model Law - enforcement of award - arbitrator's costs - adjudication - set-aside application - Article 34 - Section 21(4) - interest - statutory rate - High Court - validity of award - request for adjudication - Legal Costs Adjudicator -settlement agreement - taxation of costs - finality of arbitration awards - functus officio - lien over arbitral award.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
