Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court awards €120,000 in general damages for medical negligence regarding the failure to diagnose a serious neurological condition, where a delay in carrying out surgery resulted in more severe permanent damage to the plaintiff's bladder.
Personal injuries – medical negligence – plaintiff (b.19.10.1962) attended hospital as inpatient with back pain on several occasions in 2006 – allegation of failure to diagnose developing Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) – permanent bladder and bowel damage alleged to have resulted from failure to identify and treat her condition – whether back surgery fell below acceptable standard – whether further back surgery necessary – whether fragment of disc permitted to cause ongoing damage to nerves, causing further irreversible bladder and bowel damage – plaintiff has no useful bladder function – whether surgery should have been wide laminectomy rather than less radical hemilaminectomy – prior medical history included discectomy in 1994 and 18 months of urinary incontinence in 1994 – relevant test re medical negligence – court rejects allegation that surgery was substandard – case complicated by fact of plaintiff attending different hospitals – court satisfied that there was a failure by defendant to ensure that plaintiff had an urgent MRI scan following her latest admission to hospital in March 2006 – red flags indicative of CES at that time – surgery delayed by 48 hours due to failure to ensure urgent MRI scan – which injuries and symptoms can be connected to the CES – to what extent those injuries and symptoms can be ascribed to the delay in the surgery – expert evidence and literature are not clear as to the significance of delayed surgery in cases of CESI and CESR – court satisfied that delay led to more severe damage to bladder – even in the absence of negligence the plaintiff was highly unlikely to have recovered full bladder function – plaintiff required to self-catheterise twice daily – court not satisfied that plaintiff has established any other injuries (eg bowel problems or loss of genital sensation) which can be related to the delayed surgery – even if plaintiff had received optimum care for her CESR she would have sustained permanent neurological damage to her bladder – general damages €120,000.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.