Bank fails to discharge necessary proofs to obtain order for possession

S62(7) Registration of Title Act – Defendants separated married couple – Second Named Defendant instituted separate proceedings against First Named Defendant - application for possession – Second Named Defendant alleges systemic fraud on part of Applicant – claims to have not seen or executed documents and had nothing sent to her home address – thus challenges validity of loan documents Applicant claims charge over property and monies due since 2016 – relies on loan documents – Applicant failed to demonstrate validity thereof or to challenge Ms Cody on her claims through cross examination or other evidence – cannot rely on a document as truthful on the basis that it has been exhibited – Applicant failed to discharge the necessary proofs to obtain an order for possession.