High Court, in an application for summary judgment by bank, grants judgment in the sum of €5,205,175.90 in respect of the parts claim to which no defence has been entered, with the balance adjourned to plenary hearing so as to enable the defendant to prosecute line of defence pertaining to the existence of a collateral agreement.
Application for summary judgment in sum of €7,730,102.18 allegedly due by the defendant to plaintiff on foot of a series of credit agreements and facility letters executed between 1st September, 2006 and 28th March, 2007 - no dispute but that the defendant executed all of the relevant facility letters and drew down and has had the benefit of the funds described in them - whether defendant has any defence to proceedings - argued by defendant that, notwithstanding clear terms of written agreements executed by him, there was a collateral contractual arrangement to the effect the term of the agreement would be “for the duration of the funds” - If correct, this means that facilities were not demand facilities, nor were they repayable by March 2008 at the latest - counterclaim asserting negligence, misrepresentation, negligent misstatement, breach of duty and breach of contract against the plaintiff - defendant’s alleged defence only applies to the first and second agreements and facilities A and B of the third agreement and part of the fourth agreement - judgment entered on parts of claim to which no defence has been entered - balance of claim adjourned to plenary hearing so as to enable the defendant to prosecute the line of defence pertaining to the existence of a collateral agreement - judgment for €5,205,175.90.