Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court: (a) quashes a decision of a Chief Superintendent to refuse both an application for a certificate for a pre-2008 'grandfathered' short firearm, and an application for a certificate for a substituted modern firearm, on the grounds that the reasons given only addressed the second of the two applications without addressing the first application; and (b) directs that the applications be remitted to a different decision-maker.
Judicial review - Firearms Act 1925 - Firearms Act 1964 - 'short firearm' - firearm with barrel not longer than 30 cm or where overall length does not exceed 60 centimetres - general prohibition on grant of firearm certificates in respect of short firearms - exceptions - certificate granted in 2017 in respect of pre-2008 firearm - application in 2020 for new certificate - further application to substitute modern firearm for pre-2008 firearm - refusal of both applications - reasons given only for second decision.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.