Challenge to contents of report made following complaint of bullying does not fall within the parameters of judicial review

Employment law – judicial review – challenge to the contents of a report made by a “designated person” pursuant to under the Dignity at Work policy following a complaint of bullying - procedures to be followed upon a complaint of bullying being made – report recommended mediation - Dignity at Work policy – complaint of bullying - procedural history – amenability to judicial review - challenge to the finding that the complaint was made in good faith - no investigation, there was no adjudication, there was no finding, and there was no sanction – preliminary stage of investigation - no nexus between the statutory or public law context of the respondent and the matter impugned – requirements of natural justice – complaints do not consist of procedural complaints about the process but instead amount to an invitation to the Court to adjudicate on the merits of the bullying complaint – whether designated person should have expressed a view about whether the complaint was made in good faith - recommendation that the case be referred to mediation, and her conclusion – report was never going to be made public – judicial review refused.