Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court refused an application by a charitable organisation to quash a Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) decision allowing employment-related complaints from former employees to proceed. The applicant argued that the complaints were invalid as no prior notice had been given to the Charities Regulator, claiming such notice was a statutory precondition under a now-repealed provision. The Court found that the statutory requirement was already repealed when the proceedings were issued, so no obligation existed; furthermore, even if the requirement had applied, the applicant’s late objection after full participation in the WRC process estopped it from raising the challenge. The Court decided the WRC complaints were not "legal proceedings" under the relevant charity legislation and that it would be unconscionable and prejudicial to the employees to allow the objection at such a late stage. As a result, the application for certiorari was refused, ensuring the WRC can now determine the complaints.
judicial review – application for certiorari – Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) – charity – employment complaints – Protected Disclosures Act – Employment Equality Acts – notice requirement – Charities Act 1961 – Charities (Amendment) Act 2024 – discretionary remedy – estoppel – delay and prejudice – legal proceedings – statutory interpretation – RSC
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.