High Court grants summary judgment in the amount of €11,821,000 in respect of a loan refinancing facility now in default to plaintiff bank against the debtor (and company secretary at the time of execution) and guarantor to such facility, where the court finds the defendant's assertion, without evidence, that she was never advised of the change of the status of her co-guarantors (to an earlier similar guarantee) from one of joint and several liability to several liability only by the time of the guarantee at issue made it very clear there no fair and reasonable probability of her having a real or bona fide defence to the bank's claim.
Judgment proceedings - whether judgment should be granted or matter sent for plenary hearing - principles to be applied in application - legal test - summary summons - debtor company accepted loan refinancing facility from plaintiff grounded on defendant's personal guarantee - failure to repay following demands - defendant's grounds of resistance - whether defendant never advised of the changing nature of a joint and several liability guarantee she previously granted to the bank over company's indebtedness along with five other co-guarantors - whether a co-guarantor was given preferential treatment without her agreement such that she should be released from guarantee - whether plaintiff has entered into settlement negotiations with defendant's co-guarantors without her involvement - uncontested facts - defendant as company secretary at time of execution of facility letter - defendant provided with facility letter noting sixth guarantor alone provided a separate lesser several guarantee - no evidence of undue influence duress or diminished capacity such that defendant did not freely enter into guarantee - co-guarantors accepted the lesser status of their co-guarantor's guarantee - very clear that no case based upon a duty to disclose established - assertion of settlement negotiations with co-guarantors involving bank is unsupported by evidence on affidavit - no duty of care on bank as a consequence of change from joint and several liability to several liability - assertion of preferential treatment unsupported by affidavit evidence and is contradicted by documentation before Court - summary judgment granted