Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal upholds the High Court's decision directing the return of two children to Sweden, affirming the lower court's order despite the children's objections to the relocation, finding that the children's preference to remain in Ireland was influenced by an idealised view of life there and was not based on a realistic assessment of their welfare.
Note: there is another judgment from Ní Raifeartaigh J.
Hague Convention - child abduction - habitual residence - parental conflict - children's objections - welfare of the children - Court of Appeal - High Court - Sweden - Ireland - return order - best interests - idealised view - discretion - Convention objectives - abduction deterrence - EU member state - education - family unit - chronic conflict - psychological well-being - self-harm.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.