Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court strikes out proceedings in which the plaintiff claimed a breach of constitutional rights and breach of duty, in circumstances where the fourth-named defendant had been appointed receiver over a property, on the grounds that: the plaintiff's claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action against the defendants; the pleadings against the fourth-named defendant were unnecessary and/or scandalous; and continuation of the proceedings would only act to cause oppression, hardship and considerable expense to the defendants in having to take steps to defend a claim which could not succeed against them.
High Court - application to strike out claim on grounds that it discloses no reasonable cause of action - rules of court - inherent jurisdiction - plaintiff - plaintiff claimed to be immune to court summons - whether the facts as asserted by the plaintiff, assuming claimed breach of constitutional rights and breach of duty - fourth named defendant had been appointed receiver over property them to be true, would give rise to a potentially valid cause of action - plaintiff's claim of immunity from suit was fundamentally misconceived - none of the issues raised could be addressed by an amendment of pleadings or any interlocutory steps such as the raising of interrogatories or discovery - continuation of proceedings would only act to cause oppression, hardship and considerable expense to the defendants in having to take steps to defend a claim which could not succeed against them - claim struck out.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.