Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Supreme Court allows appeal from the Court of Appeal, and: (a) determines that an application for judicial review concerning the failure of the Clinical Director of the Central Mental Hospital to assess the conditions of release of a person deemed 'not guilty by reason of insanity' was not moot, on the grounds that there had been an alleged infringement of important constitutionally protected rights; (b) grants a declaration that the Clinical Director had failed to meet the statutory requirement to assess the conditions of release; and (c) adjourns for further consideration the question of whether the applicant was entitled to damages for breach of her rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Baker J (nem diss): Mental health - killing and attempted murder of children by mother - diagnosis of psychotic illness - reclassification as 'not guilty by reason of insanity' - Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006 - detention under review - release in 2012 - conditions of release - place of residence - decision as to place of residence vested in treating psychiatrist in Central Mental Hospital (CMH) - refusal by Clinical Director of CMH in December 2013 - to assess and put in place arrangements necessary to facilitate variations in conditions of release - application for judicial review of decision - whether application moot - whether refusal lawful - nature of conditional discharge - test for mootness - whether a substantive lis remained - mootness on the facts - whether addition of a claim for damages could save proceedings from an argument of mootness - de minimus principle - whether claim derived from so minimal a breach as to justify dismissal - de minimis non curat lex, loosely translated as “the law will not concern itself with matters of minimal significance or trifles” - whether legislation created a mandatory obligation on the Clinical Director - cause of action - constitutional remedy.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only subject matter index for all Irish judgments over the past thirteen years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now