Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses application by a co-defendant to be removed as a defendant to personal injury proceedings, in which the plaintiff claims to have been sexually abused whilst in school, on the grounds that the co-defendant’s presence is necessary to allow the court to effectually settle all the questions involved in the matter.
Application to remove a co-defendant – personal injury proceedings – plaintiff claims to have been sexually abused whilst in school – first named defendant named as agreed nominated representative of a religious order and person responsible for the school – appearance entered - incorrect that he is the agreed nominated representative - has been clear to the plaintiff since before these proceedings were instituted that the first defendant is not the agreed nominated representative – legal principles - suing a religious order or its members - liability of a religious order for acts of its congregation - vicarious liability – application of the principles - first defendant has been sued in a representative capacity rather than as an individual defendant having vicarious liability - has not been nominated by the Christian Brothers and cannot be described as the agreed nominated representative - no obligation to identify a nominated representative - presence is necessary to allow the court to effectually settle all the questions involved in the matter – application refused –
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.