Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The Court of Appeal dismisses appeal and upholds the original decision from the Dublin Circuit Criminal Court to impose consecutive sentences totaling 8 years' imprisonment on an individual for a series of violent offences, including sexual assault and assault causing harm. The appellant's plea for a reduced sentence was rejected, with the court finding that the imposition of consecutive sentences was justified due to the exceptional nature of the crimes, which spanned a protracted period and involved multiple offences. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the sentence was proportionate to the appellant's culpability and that the principle of totality had been implicitly considered, even though not expressly articulated by the trial judge.
Court of Appeal, consecutive sentences, sexual assault, assault causing harm, production of an article capable of causing serious injury, proportionality, totality principle, mitigation, victim impact statement, Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997, Criminal Law (Rape) (Amendment) Act 1990, Firearms and Offensive Weapons Act 1990, Misuse of Drugs Act 1977, plea of guilty, appeal dismissed.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.