High Court refuses judicial review of conviction for driving without insurance, on the grounds that the convicted person had no policy of insurance within the meaning of the legislation as he had taken out an insurance policy whilst disqualified from driving, which was contrary to the terms of his policy
Judicial review – criminal law – road traffic offences - man convicted of driving without insurance seeking to quash his conviction - failing to produce a certificate of insurance – he was disqualified from driving - while disqualified, he took out a policy of motor insurance – policy included proviso whereby the holder of the policy could not be disqualified - did not disclose his disqualification - stopped by a member of An Garda Síochána – eventually produced certificate - Section 56 (1) of the Road Traffic Act 1961 – argued that the purpose of the legislation is to ensure that a person injured by the negligent use of a mechanically propelled vehicle in a public place shall not be left without compensation – argued that where there is an insurance policy in place which enjoins the insurer to compensate an injured third party, no offence is committed - immaterial to criminal liability under the section that the insurer may have a right over against the insured by virtue of breach of the policy condition to recover the amount of any compensation paid from the insured - whether or not the applicant was “insured” – purpose of insurance - cannot be regarded as being “insured” - fact that the insurer concerned may have a statutory obligation to compensate an injured third party is immaterial – argument in reality confuses two entirely different things being the contractual right to an indemnity on the one hand and the statutory obligation to compensate on the other – no policy of insurance within the meaning of s. 56 (1) – Court dismissed the application