Convictions quashed on three counts due to insufficient evidence of abuse at complainant’s residence

Court of Appeal upholds the majority of convictions against an individual for indecent assault, while quashing the convictions on three specific counts due to a lack of evidence supporting allegations of abuse at the complainant's residence after the defendant ceased visiting for meals, the court finding that there was sufficient evidence presented to uphold the appellant's convictions for indecent assault in a vehicle when driving the complainant home; and the appeal is dismissed on all other counts, with the court finding no basis for claims of perversity or inconsistency in the jury's verdicts.