Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court, following an unsuccessful appeal against a refusal of the Circuit Court to endorse a personal insolvency arrangement, made an order of costs against the unsuccessful creditor as: (a) the practice concerning making no order as to costs in these matters does not apply to appeals; and (b) the arguments raised by the creditor were neither novel nor of assistance to the Court.
Costs of appeal – appeal had been dismissed with creditor unsuccessful – S115(A) of the Personal Insolvency Act 2012 – costs entirely at discretion of Court – practice is that a first hearing under s.115 should incur no order as to costs if substantive issues raised either in law or evidence by unsuccessful creditor - but no practice for appeals – open to the Court to do so if the court feels the unsuccessful creditor has been of assistance to the Court – creditors argument in instant case neither novel nor of assistance – action likely to be unsuccessful in any event as value of debt exceeded value of home - not appropriate to make an order of no costs – order of costs against unsuccessful creditor.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.