Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal awards costs to successful respondent who had been 'entirely successful' in an appeal, where the appellant had failed to engage with the court's principal findings in his submissions on costs.
Noonan J (nem diss): Supplemental judgment - dismissal of appeal - costs - whether respondent obliged to disclose certain matters - whether judicial review would have been unnecessary if disclosure made - Legal Services Regulation Act, 2015, sections 168 and 169 - whether one party 'entirely successful' - discretion of court not to order costs against losing party - whether special reasons - basis for departing from normal rule.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.