Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court reviewed An Bord Pleanála's decision to grant planning permission for a wind farm, focusing on procedural issues related to environmental assessments. The applicant, an environmental NGO, argued that the Board failed to adequately assess the impact on the Hen Harrier, a protected species, and did not properly publish the Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) on its website. The court found that while the Board's publication of documents was flawed, it did not invalidate the decision. The court granted declaratory relief for the publication issue but upheld the planning permission, noting the applicant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or a flawed assessment process. The court also considered the discretion to refuse relief despite procedural errors, emphasising the need for a lacuna-free appropriate assessment as a jurisdictional prerequisite.
Judicial review, wind farm, planning permission, An Bord Pleanála, Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR), Hen Harrier, Special Protection Area (SPA), Appropriate Assessment (AA), public participation, Planning and Development Act 2000, Habitats Directive, environmental NGO, declaratory relief, procedural flaws, discretion, lacunae, jurisdiction.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.