High Court orders the furnishing of the Inspector’s interim report into the affairs of a media group to all of the applicants, given their respective interests, but with appropriate redactions so as to ensure that the progress of the inspection is not impeded and its integrity not jeopardised.
Company law - pplication of numerous persons and entities (“the Applicants”) to be provided with copies of an interim report presented to the court by Inspectors appointed over a media group – Court had appointed inspectors - Inspectors were directed to deliver an interim report - terms of reference - Data Interrogation issue - statutory provisions
Director’s approach - Inspectors’ approach – applicants - discretion - all of the Applicants agree that they have no absolute entitlement to a copy of the Inspectors’ report - statutory entitlement to apply to the court and thereafter it is a matter of the court’s discretion as to whether they should be furnished with a copy of the report – caselaw - that the furnishing of a copy of the report to the Applicants would in any way interfere with the oversight by the Inspectors – Inspectors opposed to the provision of the report in its totality - court should not take any step which might impede the progress of the inspection or jeopardise in any way the integrity and progress of the inspection - no objection to those parts of the report which do not deal with evidential matters being disclosed – Court directs the furnishing of the report to all of the Applicants given their respective interests but with appropriate redactions so as to fully take account of the Inspectors’ concerns.