Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses constitutional inquiry into detention, finding that the applicant’s detention was lawful in respect of the re-activation of a suspended sentence he received on appeal from the District Court in the Circuit Court.
Criminal law – Article 40.4.2 inquiry – habeas corpus – re-activation of suspended sentences – s. 99 of the Criminal Justice Act 2006 – meaning of the word “convicted” – s. 50 of the Courts (Supplemental) Provisions Act 1961 – noscitur a sociis (the meaning of a word may be known from accompanying words) – whether warrant is bad on its face – applicant’s detention has been shown to be in accordance with law.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.