Decision maker failed to make explicit findings of fact on core issue in application for permission to remain in the State

Applicant seeking international protection - International Protection Act 2015 - Appellant refused permission to remain in the State - Appellant refused a refugee or subsidiary protection declaration - Statutory interpretation - Whether the International Protection Act 2015 requires a single IPO to perform all required tasks - Whether addendums to interviews must be done so within a specific time-frame - failure to give proper reasons on refoulement decisions - failure to make explicit findings of fact - trial judge did not err in interpretation of international protection legislation - impractical - no temporal requirement - addendum can be made at a later stage - decision does not make findings of fact - decision adopts as its starting position the prior views reached in the application for international protection - appellant not at risk of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - relevant country of origin information - question on applicants sexual orientation should have been included and answered in decision making process - must be explicit findings of fact on core issue in applicants claim - assertion of a sexual orientation is starting point of process rather than end point - decision quashed - remit matter for consideration of core issue of fact - explicit findings of fact required