Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses an application to quash a decision of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Tribunal excluding the applicants, the children of a man who was fatally shot at his home, from compensation on the grounds of their father's conduct, the court finding that that the applicants had not established the the decision of the Tribunal was ultra vires, and nor had they established that the respondent's decision was unreasonable or that its discretion was fettered.
Criminal Injuries Compensation Tribunal - compensation scheme - victims of violent crime - children of a man who was shot at his home - applied to have a decision to exclude them from compensation, due to the criminal conduct of their father, quashed - whether ultra vires.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.