The High Court, having refused an application for summary judgment in a case where the plaintiff, currently in liquidation, sought to recover a sum of €US$1,830,059 plus interest based on a contract, determines that an order reserving the costs of proceedings to date best meets the interests of justice. The court found that the defendant had presented a bona fide defence, challenging the existence of the contract and suggesting that, even if a contract were found, the appropriate remedy would be damages for breach of contract rather than the liquidated sum claimed. The matter has been adjourned for a plenary hearing to resolve the factual disputes. Thus, the court reserved the decision on costs, finding it premature to allocate them until the factual issues are settled at trial.
summary judgment, contract dispute, bona fide defence, plenary hearing, disputed facts, repudiation, renunciation, breach of contract, damages, liquidated sum, High Court, Legal Services Regulation Act, 2015, Rules of the Superior Courts (RSC), costs reserved.