High Court refuses judicial review of decision refusing Bangladeshi national subsidiary protection, on the grounds that the Minister for Justice’s decision was reasonable and logical.
Judicial review – asylum and immigration – substantive decision - Bangladeshi national challenging decision refusing subsidiary protection – refused asylum – refused leave to remain – deportation order made – point on which leave granted subsequently rejected in subsequent decisions - enmeshment of the subsidiary protection and deportation processes – submitted that the balance of the grounds adjourned - married a Polish national – deportation order revoked - five-year permission granted - wife was granted an Irish passport - applied for Irish citizenship – leave granted on remaining grounds - litany of procedural failures by the Bangladeshi national - effect of partial grant of leave - absence of explicit application for extension of time to issue the substantive notice of motion – points already rejected - failure to examine all relevant facts under art. 4 of the Qualification Directive - all submissions were considered - complaint that matters were raised disputing the tribunal findings that are not dealt with - reliance on asylum claim rather than subsidiary protection claim – generalised nature of the claim.