Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Directions given concerning reference of planning question to EU Court of Justice
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court gives procedural directions in relation to a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) concerning a judicial review application for a domestic development consent. The applicants' case was initially deemed one day late, but the court recognised the need to clarify EU law on the matter.
EU law, domestic development consent, judicial review, timeliness, Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), preliminary reference, procedural directions, amicus curiae, anonymisation, document management, Advocate General, High Court, statutory extension of time, procedural mayhem, amendment of pleadings, acte clair (clear act), Article 267 TFEU.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
