Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal, having dismissed an appeal against conviction of rape, and pending an appeal against severity of sentence, refuses to amend the grounds of appeal to introduce a new ground concerning the admissibility of the evidence of a particular witness, on the grounds that: (a) although the court had the power to introduce a new ground of appeal, it should only do so in exceptional circumstances, giving the public interest in the finality of litigation; and (b) the appellant had failed to point to any exceptional procedural error, new or newly discovered fact, or other exceptional circumstances that would justify reopening a concluded appeal.
Criminal law - rape - sexual assault - section 48 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 - section 2 of the Criminal Law (Rape) Act 1981 - section 2 of the Criminal Law (Rape) (Amendment) Act 1990 - jury conviction of rape - disagreement on sexual assault - appeal against conviction and sentence of eight years - appeal against conviction dismissed in separate judgment - attempt to re-open appeal against conviction - introduction of new ground - whether open to court to consider new ground of appeal after dismissing appeal - s. 12(1) of the Courts (Supplementary Provisions) Act 1961 - power to 'determine any questions necessary to be determined for the purpose of doing justice in the case before it' - whether a 'real risk of injustice' - finality in litigation - appeal not yet concluded, where sentence issue not addressed.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.